Update/EQMM/Notice/

Having just returned from Prague, I’ve received great news: Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine is buying the story I wrote about a month ago, called “Investment in Vevey”—a tale of two young Texans in Europe committing tourism fraud, and how, once they believe everything is all right, a sweet old Texan couple becomes their greatest nightmare. I’m very pleased. When it comes out is anyone’s guess, as I’m told they have quite a backlog of stuff.



The story seems to have some appeal, for it’s the same one that piqued the interest of an agent in LA who asked me to work up an outline and some pages of screenplay. I did that, sent them off, and am still awaiting his reaction.



Waiting seems like a common act these days. Not only am I waiting for word from LA, I’m also waiting on my editor’s reaction to my redraft of Book 4, presently called Liberation Movements. As well—and perhaps more anxiously—I’m awaiting reviews of 36 Yalta Boulevard, which, after nearly a month of circulation, has received two online reviews, and another in Texas Monthly. I’m not complaining, because each of these places is great, but…



Okay, well maybe I am, because with my previous two books reviews came somewhat quickly after the book’s release, and I’m under the cloud of belief that if a book doesn’t make waves quickly, it ain’t gonna make them.



However, yesterday I did notice that my little book had been done a fine honor, being placed in the right-hand column of Ms Weinman’s esteemed broadsheet as a recommended read. A recommendation by her is a great thing indeed, and I thank her for it.



So with all this waiting, one might ask, “How do you find time for writing—do you find time for writing?” Well, yes, somehow it happens. Even though I’m still showing my sister the grandeur that is Central Europe (and next week, the grandeur that was the Balkans), I still find time to type. I’m 50pp into the fifth and final book of the crime series, which will take much longer than the others to write, as I expect it to clock in at somewhere around 1000 pages. And because I know that will take so long, I’m also working on the shorter novel I mentioned somewhere below, about a man who leaves his family after 9/11, pretending he made it to a Twin Towers meeting on time, and died. Years later, he runs into his widow on a Budapest street. Story ensues.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

Comparisons

Today I found a lovely write-up of 36 Yalta Boulevard, reviewed by Andi Shechter for Bookreporter.com. In it, she compares my books, and in particular this one, to the master of espionage fiction, John LeCarre, though she steps back to remind the reader that

As a reviewer, I’m aware of the pitfalls of comparing authors, and I don’t do it lightly; as a reader, I’m often dismayed when I read recommendations that say “if you like X, you’ll like Y” because the comparisons are often based on superficial values of X and Y —- books set in the same place, authors who happen to be female, or male. Big deal.


Gorky Park









But my comparison of Steinhauer to le Carre comes from an appreciation of both authors’ ability to show a distinctly non-glamorous everyday espionage, devoid of ringing heartfelt flag-waving or patriotism. […] And le Carre’s plots, which inevitably leave me confused but still involved, are rather Byzantine and I usually just wait until the end of the book where, I hope, all is explained. Often, however, the reader is left puzzled.


Yaltanot





Texas Monthly/A New Bond

I tracked down my first print review for a general audience (that is, not an industry mag, and not on the web) last night, which comes from Texas Monthly. And I’m pleased to say it’s a good one, even with a first-chapter excerpt. Mike Shea points out that

Steinhauer’s world of shadow and fog succeeds by harking back to politico thrillers that were about real politics (think Graham Greene and Len Deighton), not flash-bang gizmos.










Ms WeinmanLee ChildThe Visitor



The Visitor





The Work Never Gets Less Exhausting

As the time draws near to the official June 1 release of 36 Yalta Boulevard (though it’s been available at Amazon and B&N for a few days), I find myself working harder than ever on other projects.



This morning I sent off a short story to my agent, “Investing in Vevey”, about a young Texan couple in Naples who commit large-scale tourism fraud, succeed brilliantly, and are then haunted by the Italian Mafia, who want a slice. But in the end, the Mafiosi turn out not be who they say, nor are they interested in money. They want revenge.



I also sent off a list of five ideas to a film agent at Endeavor, who my literary agent knows. Thank God for networking! The hope is that something will be of interest, and I can move on to the outline/writing stage with some confidence. Over the past couple years I’ve penned two scripts, only to find out, once I was finished, that their subjects/storylines weren’t salable. Fair enough. At least I got some more practice in the form. But this time around I want to know there’s a possibility my hard work will pay off. Even if none of the ideas strike this agent’s interest, it’ll be interesting to get his feedback, because the logic of Hollywood, as we all know, is an entirely different beast from the logic of real life.



I wanted to get these things out because the really big project is now in front of me: the revisions (and in many ways, re-writing) for my fourth novel, presently called LIBERATION MOVEMENTS. My previous books were relatively easy to revise—by the time they reached my editor they were pretty good to go, with some minor alterations. This time, I’ve gone for a different kind of storytelling and a different pace; the plot doesn’t depend as much on the politics of the time, and it involves Soviet research into parapsychology—a real departure from the hard-nosed reality of my previous books.



Which adds up to missteps and problems a-plenty, and lots of work for me now. Luckily, I have a wonderful editor at St Martin’s Minotaur, Kelley Ragland, who has an iron-clad shit-detector. She, like all the best editors, is able to see what I, as the author, was always unconsciously aware of, but too lazy or cocky to actually fix myself.



So I better stop procrastinating and get on it.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

They Begin...

Reviews, that is. After the initial four-pack of prepub reviews (noted below), the time’s drawing near to the June 1 release date for 36 Yalta Boulevard, and, having obsessive tendencies, I google the title now and then to see if anything’s come up. Well, something has. James Clar over at The Mean Streets has taken the time to write up an extensive and, to me, wonderful review of the book.



In particular, I appreciate the attention he gives to some of the central themes in the book, which he nails on the head. While all novelists want reviewers to report that they’ve spun a ripping good tale, it’s especially satisfying when a reviewer, in addition, delves deeper into the “why” of the story. James says,

Brano Sev is truly a remarkable character. He is a man who defines himself almost entirely in terms of his duty and who sacrifices his own happiness on the altar of a cause he comes to suspect is utterly bankrupt. But without that cause — without faith in “causes” in general — what are we?




Yr Ainglish

Kevin over at Collected Miscellany linked to this amusing quiz, which may, or may not, have a linguistic basis in truth. But based on the prevalence of Dixie, I imagine there’s some truth here. Yes, I do say y’all at times.















Your Linguistic Profile:



55% General American English
30% Dixie
10% Yankee
5% Upper Midwestern
0% Midwestern


No Writer Is An Island

I’m not the kind of blogger to regale one with the contents of my regular days, nor the contents of my lunch, but today provoked me to ramble a little. After spending a rather productive morning coming up with a surprising 2000 words on a short story about a shyster couple in Switzerland running from the Italian cosa nostra, and then visiting the garden store with my girlfriend to find items to brighten up our back yard—though my job was to take care of Bogi, our hyperactive dog, outside the store—I came back to the apartment and proceeded to join two organizations. The Mystery Writers of America, and then, the International Thriller Writers, Inc.



Now, why did I do this? It’s like the story where a man goes to work, comes home, plays with the dog and the kids, eats dinner, goes to bed with his wife, then for no known reason, gets out of bed and slaughters the whole family, including, tragically, the dog.



OK, well, it’s not quite like that. But the facts are these: Last year, both of these esteemed organizations invited me to join their ranks. I, in turn, skimmed the literature they’d sent, then threw it in the trash. Me, a joiner? Come on. In high school I’d even been troubled to be part of my sole organization, the German Club, because…well, because it seemed ludicrous to live in an alternate reality where my name was Markus instead of Olen, and where the conversations were primarily about what was on a fictional German menu.



I suppose the reasons are obvious. Writing is an intensely solitary task. Outside of grad school, I’d seldom commiserated with other writers. And in grad school, I learned, there was less commiseration than jealousy, which led to most of the cardinal sins. So I spent my time with nonwriters, with musicians, painters, budding filmmakers and amateur philosophers. Only recently have I fallen in with journalists, but that’s still different, their craft as mysterious to me as mine is to them.



But times change. I had the good fortune of being nominated for an Edgar, and in the process met my first batch of crime writers, who were all swell and, more to the point, supportive of each other. You don’t get that everywhere, and Ken has noted this to me, that within the crime genre people actually want one another to succeed, whether or not they’re disappointed about losing an award, which in the end means rather little. Since then, through the internet, I’ve met many more interesting and funny characters who are part of this world of mystery, and I’ve liked it. I’ve liked calling them, if not friends, then at least acquaintances.



So, today, in the space of twenty minutes, I suddenly expanded the circle in which I walk. I haven’t met most of these other members, and it’s possible I never will, but it’s nice, when you’re on the edge of your own known world, to know they’re there.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

Couldn't've Said It Better...

After the fits of self-questioning that inevitably attack me when I read critical reviews, it was a real pleasure today to see the glowing, starred review from the last of the four pre-publication magazines, Booklist. It’s below, in its uncorrected proof form (I just hope the corrected proof doesn’t take out the last line!):

*STAR* Steinhauer, Olen. 36 Yalta Boulevard. June 2005. 320p. St. Martin’s/Minotaur, $23.95 (0-312-33201-7).



Brano Sev is Steinhauer’s most intriguing hero yet, and that’s saying something. The disappointments and betrayals of 20 years have seasoned the earnest young apparatchik first seen menacing the background in The Bridge of Sighs (2002), the debut of this loose-knit Eastern Bloc series. In that tale, Sev was a poignant mix of hope and despair, idealism and ironic apathy that landed him squarely in Graham Greeneland. Now, it’s 1966, and after being framed by a fellow spy, Sev has a chance to redeem himself with the Party by tracking a person of interest who has appeared in his childhood village. When a badly slashed corpse turns up, it seems as though we’re headed toward a mystery, but Steinhauer has many, many more surprises in store, and we are led with Sev into zbrka, a perplexing maze that takes him to Vienna, where he is left out in the cold until an old flame flares up. With its shifting perceptions, pervasive paranoia, and truly unpredictable plot, this will be savored by readers of well-crafted espionage ranging from Alan Furst to John le Carre’ —David Wright






zbrkaLibrary Journal





Whirlwind's End

Yesterday the taxi dropped me, exhausted, back home from the Budapest Airport after a whirlwind 48 hours in the Big Apple. I can safely report that nothing got broken, despite the fact that Ken Bruen and I put away a fair volume of spirits.



It all began pretty quietly. I arrived early Saturday evening at the Mansfield, where I was booked for two nights (Ken wouldn’t arrive until the next day). Wonderful hotel, which I originally learned about from Ken, for whom it is a favorite. After unloading my bags and cleaning up, I went to the only place I could think to go—the hotel’s “M Bar”. Two martinis later and after an educational talk with the bartender and waitress about the state of American television acting (apparently being crushed by the prevalence of reality shows), I grabbed some mouth-inferno lamb vindaloo from the Indian restaurant across the street, began watching Tomorrow Never Dies on my computer, and promptly passed out.



Pretty boring, huh?



Well, by Sunday dinnertime I was finally reminded why the hell I was in Manhattan. Over a delicious Italian dinner with Ken, his editor Ben Sevier, my agent Matt Williams and my editor Kelley Ragland, we pow-wowed about the next day’s lunch. This lunch, the point of my visit and the starting-point of what will surely be a mind-blowing tour by Ken Bruen, would be a much more indirect affair than I’d imagined. It was simple (and perhaps simply brilliant): Place two novelists in a room with the representatives of Esquire, GQ, Time, Mystery Scene, Publishers Weekly and Library Journal, and give them fantastic food from Manhattan’s newest hotspot, BLT Fish.



“So,” I said warily, “are we going to be reading from our books or something?”



“No,” said Kelley. “You’ll have lunch.”



I was having trouble getting this. “You flew me across the world, for lunch?”



She nodded. “And getting to know these people. Conversation.”



“Charm,” said Ken, nervously fingering the vest pocket holding his cigarettes.



Charm—or a charm offensive—had always been the unstated point of this plan, but now it was being said aloud. We had to be charming, witty and memorable. If we weren’t, then St Martin’s investment in us was just a joke.



So, the pressure intensified.



But both Ken and I tried to blow it off. Outside, smoking in the cold, we kept saying, “Nothing to worry about, they’ll love us.”



People repeat things in order to convince themselves; the most repeated things in history have usually been lies. And we repeated that hopeful lie continuously until 1am, when, after a conversation with Mike, the “M” bartender, and filled with Jameson’s (Ken) and Bombay Sapphire (myself), we took the miserable elevator ride to the loneliness of our rooms.



The next morning, I met Ken and our St Martin’s posse at the Flatiron and we walked to BLT Fish. As we neared, I became more and more convinced that our guests were only coming in order to write-up something about the restaurant and thus make their first steps into the more lucrative world of restaurant reviewing.



And with that in mind, the first thing I ordered was a gin martini.



But I drank slowly, under the watchful eye of Kelley, my editor, who had been giving us warnings since the previous night, when they all worried Ken and I would repeat our ‘04 Edgars 6am drinking session.



Then the guests started arriving. Kate Stine from Mystery Scene came first, and with her entrance my nervousness began to dissipate. She was cordial and kind and, above all, interested. I didn’t see her take a single culinary note during the entire meal. We were soon joined by Dick Donohue of Publishers Weekly, who manages to shift his goatee into a variety of expressions of scorn and leave such amateurs as myself stunned by his versatility. After no time at all he was advising me on how to best produce a scathing scornful stare. Andrea Sachs from Time has her own kind of stare which is entirely devoid of scorn—it is instead a sign of intelligent curiosity, not entirely unlike a cat’s.



Since the St Martin’s posse was rather large (not including us novelists, I seem to remember five) I didn’t get to meet many of the rest until we were sitting down. The technique devised by Linda McFall, the astute and passionate organizer of the event, was to separate Ken and I by having two tables. Halfway through the lunch Ken and I would switch seats, so everyone got a piece of our action. Neither Ken nor I were pleased about this—we felt that close proximity would not only give us mutual support, but the jokes would fly easier as well. But this was not to be, and I was soon able to see why. While both Ken and I write books with deaths and the occasional mystery for St Martin’s Minotaur, that’s almost where the similarities end. Linda and the rest of the team wanted us to show our individual personalities. And I think this worked out.



At table 1, I was introduced to the charming book editor for GQ, Stephanie Davis, and soon our table (including Kate and Dick, as well as members of the St Martins posse) was rolling along as if we were all old friends. What, I asked myself, had I been worried about? Fact is, New York high-fliers are, despite how they’re depicted in such cinematic classics as Sweet Home Alabama, just great folks who’ve simply accomplished more than you or me. Of course, this was no scientific sampling: It consisted of people in the publishing world. But it backs up my experience so far, that publishing is, depsite all the conglomerates and casual axing of employees, still a personal business. I wouldn’t expand this to include something like the NY stock market.



Once the halfway point was reached, I was, despite my enjoyment, dying for a cigarette. I had been going easy on my martini (always aware of Kelley watching from across the table), so it was a bearable need, but it was there nonetheless. Ken and I were to switch tables now, so I decided to grab a smoke before settling in my new seat. But that wasn’t to be, because Ken and I were informed it was time to make a speech.



A speech.



Now, this had never been part of the plan. And so neither of us had anything prepared. We (or at least I) whined at Linda, who kept repeating last night’s lie: “Nothing to worry about.” So, cigaretteless and now needing one far more than before, I sat, said hello to my new table-mates, and began to sweat profusely. John Cunningham, the Minotaur publisher, stood up and said a few things I don’t remember, and the floor was turned over to Ken, who stood and began to speak.



What did Ken say? Well, I don’t remember that either because I was deperately trying to figure out what I was going to say to this esteemed group. I wondered if being obstinate would get me off the hook, or perhaps no one would notice if I went out for that cigarette. Then some of Ken’s elegant words reached me and I realized he was recounting a trip to Texas after last year’s Edgars, and his surprise at seeing the small size of the Alamo. He was telling a story—yes! Brilliant! That’s what I would do. A nice Budapest tale to hold everyone enraptured for five minutes and relieve me of having to think of something else.



But as he wrapped up his typically engaging story, my mind remained blank. It was as if I’d just been born at that moment, and had nothing to recall. They applauded Ken’s lovely tale, and then turned to look at me.



So I stood. And began to speak.



What did I say?



I have no earthy idea. The words just trickled out over what could have been an hour or 30 seconds, and then I sat down.



People applauded.



And I ran off for a cigarette.



Admittedly, I do remember one thing I said, because I stole it from Ken. The previous night, he’d said that we should mention that the link between the two of us is that he’s a European writer inspired by American fiction, while I’m an American writer inspired by European fiction. And since he didn’t mention it himself (later he said he left that gem for me), I could steal it without remorse.



After the cigarette, I rejoined table 2, all of whom were probably dismayed that I showed up, gave a disjoined speech, and then fled—though all were New York-charming enough not to mention it. Andrea from Time sat to my left, and though I found her charming we had a momentary squabble (actually, a tongue-in-cheek squabble) when I learned that the speeches were at her bidding. To my right with her intense and mesmerizing stare, sat Anna Godberson from Esquire. Wilda Williamson from Library Journal called fine questions from the other side of the table (and later told me to expect a forthcoming review in her journal), as did Charles Taylor, a reviewer for Salon and the New York Times (among others), who, while more reticent to speak, always made clever inquiries. Peter Cannon from Publishers Weekly acted similarly, watching all the time. Both these men seemed vaguely clandestine, intensely observing the movements of conversation, as if noting them for a surveillance report to be made to their local rezident.



Or maybe that’s only my paranoia. Again.



Table 2 had more of a question-answer dynamic, which was great—a question gives you direction, and I was allowed to expand on what was expandable, finally remembering that I actually did have a life before that day’s lunch. Which was good, because the martini was finished, and without direction I could’ve said anything.



Of course, what one really wants to know is, how was the food at BLT Fish? It was excellent. I had baked chicken with stuffing and asparagus on the side, and afterward what was perhaps hazlenut ice cream with…ok, I don’t remember, but I think it was some kind of cake. Chocolate, perhaps. But quite tasty.



We said our farewells to the guests (feeling quite buoyant I even forced people to embrace one another before leaving), and Ken and I stood around, trembling slightly, and learning from our posse that we actually did a good job. Did I detect a note of surprise in their voices? (Well, no.) And apparently the mysterious words I said in my speech came off well. I just wish I could remember them. In celebration, I ordered a second martini.



Out on the curb, waiting for the car to pick me up, I said my goodbyes to everyone. And Ken and I, as usual, embraced like the old friends we’ve become, despite the fact we see each other only once a year. We made plans for more frequent meet-ups, because with a man as tremendous as he is, once a year just isn’t enough. Then I handed out kisses like they were going out of style.



On the plane going home, I was elated (and a little drunk—waiting at an airport gate is dull business, but at least they install bars) and still somewhat bewildered by everything. A mere 48 hours, a surprisingly relaxing lunch, and I was on a plane again beside a Bulgarian veterinarian who spoke no English, so I used my little Serbian to chat with him. When the drinks came around he said, “Pivo!” [beer], and I agreed. Which was a blessing, because after the drink I fell asleep, waking to find from the digital map that we were already somewhere over Ireland.



Which, thinking of Ken, my comrade-in arms, seemed very appropriate.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)