I Heart Adler

Dick Adler, that is, who’s always been so supportive of my books. In last Sunday’s Chicago Tribune, he reviews Edward Wright’s Red Sky Lament, and to address Wright’s literary prowess, Adler opens with this paragraph:

Should crime fiction—written mostly for profit and entertainment—be expected to compete in the artistic arena, to strive for that abused but occasionally useful classification “literature?” Probably not: The field is too skewed to make such comparisons fair. But every now and then a writer of thrillers or mysteries emerges who deserves to be compared with the best. The list of names is short, each tied to a territory or period: Charles McCarry, who has played the Cold War like a lute; Olen Steinhauer, who makes the communist side of that war understandable; Sara Paretsky, who holds the rough, greedy heart of Chicago in her hand. You probably have one or two candidates.




The Release of Spezi

Previously here I mentioned the unwarranted arrest of Italian journalist Mario Spezi in Florence. As usual, I learned about it from the always up-to-date Ms Weinman, and today, also from her, I learn that he’s now been freed.



Sarah spoke with the American thriller writer, Douglas Preston, with whom Spezi had been working on a book dealing with the “Monster of Florence”, who killed “16 people between 1968 and 1985 that led to one of the most expensive, most notorious criminal cases in Italian history.”



Preston had this to say:

[On Saturday morning], unexpectedly, an independent three-judge panel annulled the imprisonment of the Italian journalist Mario Spezi and ordered his immediate release. He was set free unconditionally, not even under house arrest. The judges clearly did not think very highly of the evidence—or rather the lack thereof—that Judge Mignini and Chief Inspector Giuttari had presented against Spezi. While Spezi’s legal problems are far from over, at least he is finally out of the grim Capanne Prison.



My friends in Italy tell me that the enormous publicity surrounding the case, in Italy and in America, was an important reason why the panel took the unusual step of overruling a fellow judge and annulling Mignini’s order of imprisonment.






Go to Sarah’s

Andre Braugher

Those in the States might already be very familiar with “Thief”, which brings back the incredible Andre Braugher, who first came to national attention playing Frank Pembleton in “Homicide: Life on the Street”.



I first heard of this show during my last visit to New York, where my girlfriend and I kept seeing Andre’s face on the sides of busses advertising his new show, “Thief”. I’d point and say to her: “Wow! Andre Braugher! I’m so glad he’s back!”



A quick Net search pulls up endless reviews of the show, the reviewers almost unanimously mesmerized by Braugher’s performance. Some say he has that indefinable “it” quality of the greatest of actors. I can buy that.



I’ve watched the first four of its 6 first-season episodes, which move like a miniseries, and its pilot episode hooked me immediately. From TV.com:

Nick Atwater is a thief who has done a good job of separating his profession from his personal life. However, this all changes after a botched heist reveals all. Later on, Nick returns home to New Orleans and learns that his wife has been involved in an auto accident. This means he has to deal with a stepdaughter who doesn’t like him at all.


Sound simple? It is, but not for long, and with sharp writing and great performances across the board, it hits hard.



I hope its ratings in the States are high, because after the failure of his various series since “Homicide”, I want Braugher back in the spotlight. He’s a dead serious actor who deserves plenty of attention.


Falling Sickness: Chernobyl

Yesterday was the twentieth anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, an occasion I’d planned to mark with a post on what happened. But the fact is, you can find better information elsewhere. I know because I’ve been looking into it recently, as the event caps the first long section of the big novel I’m writing, which covers a couple weeks in 1986. I’m a novelist, not a historian.



Then it occurred to me that perhaps posting an excerpt from that final 1986 chapter might be the best route. After all, what I have to say about the event I’ve already put into this.



So after the link, you’ll find excerpts from chapter 38 of Falling Sickness.



Many of the names—Katja (and her husband, Aron), Imre and Bernard—will be new even to those who’ve read my books, since the younger militiapeople begin arriving in the 4th book in the series, Liberation Movements, due out later this year. There’s an “I” character, who is me, at the time 16 years old, with a girlfriend (in reality as well as in this fiction) named Jennifer. “Mister Shevchenko” is my high school math teacher, who has been kidnapped by a Ministry agent named Gavra (one of the stars of Liberation Movements) and is subsequently killed. The Agota mentioned is Agota Kolyeszar, daughter of Ferenc, first seen as a child in The Confession. The photographs at the end are meant to be in the book, and the stuff about Hashimoto syndrome is sadly true.

Temporary Cultures: More Artifacts

These images come from a massive tome called Omagiu—or, Homage. This book was republished yearly in Romania, beginning in the seventies, when their “Conduc?tor”, or leader, Nicolae Ceau?escu got it into his head that his friend, Kim Il Sung of North Korea, had a pretty good thing going in regards to his personality cult. So, each year, on Nicolae’s birthday, this tribute to him was published, each year becoming larger and larger—not just in pages, but in page size. The version I picked up while in Romania was published in 1978 and runs about 650 pages. It’s mostly filled with letters sent in from various Romanian towns, wishing Nicolae great good health on his birthday, as well as official letters from governments. But the images are what interest me. Come see:





The central theme of Omagiu is this:

The Ceau?escus are famous and people like them!


Sadly, this was true for a while, because he was seen by the West as standing up to Moscow, and in the Cold War this meant something. But after a brief honeymoon of relative progressiveness (compared to his predecessor, Gheorghiu-Dej) during the sixties, he became more of a Stalinist than even Moscow could swallow. Slowly, steadily, everyone began to abandon Nicolae.I sometimes wonder how much Nicolae believed his own propaganda. He had Securitate (secret police) men hiding in the woods when he hunted; they’d shoot at the same time he did, to assure a direct hit. Each year (as Romanian papers avidly reported), Nicolae was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. What the papers didn’t bother mentioning is that all it takes to be nominated is for someone in a country’s government to nominate you. Nicolae’s people did this yearly.




Family man.

If you sit with important people, then you are important.



(Click to make larger, and check out the guy with Nicolae in the top left.

I never knew Ron Jeremy was an ambassador.)




Nicolae and his wife, Elena, aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty!


They’re visiting a mine (and if you forget who the guy in the

Fahrenheit 451 fireman outfit is, just look at the banner on the wall).

Side note: A Dutch friend just called and told me a story about a friend of hers living in Romania. He likes garden gnomes, and bought the “Seven Dwarves” for his garden. But no “Snow White”. Why? Apparently, the Romanian shops’ Snow White is an exact replica of Elena Ceau?escu, and one doesn’t want her in one’s yard. Which makes them both wonder, who are the dwarves replicas of? No answers yet…






Everyone loves them!

(click for larger)


When I went looking for this book back in 2000 in Bucharest, I was surprised how hard it was to track down. At one time, it was an obligatory part of every worker’s bookshelf. I scoured the used bookstores, and when I asked, received scornful looks in reply. “Why do you want that?” Finally I tracked it down from a guy selling books on the street. He, too, was perplexed.



It got worse, though, when I explained my reasons. I was writing a book on the Romanian Revolution of 1989 (though to many Romanians, “revolution” is too strong a word for it—it’s overshadowed by conspiracies), and was writing a 100-page section from Nicolae’s point-of-view during his last hours, when he was captured, tried, and executed on Christmas Day. I wanted to gather as much material as I could about this man, so I could better understand him.



Understandably, people didn’t take to this well. “Why write about him? Just forget the bastard!” Fair enough, but I had my own interests, and Omagiu helped me start to come to grips with a time and place that no longer exists, and a culture that was no less scarring for its brevity.



———



Addition: Here’s a lovely one from our friends at Wikipedia:





The Great Transformation

In the list toward the bottom right of this page, you’ll find a link to a New York Times review of a fascinating-sound book called The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions, by Karen Armstrong, which looks at one of the earliest turning points in the history of world religion—when “the crowded heaven of warring gods, worshiped in violent rites, lost its grip on the human imagination, which increasingly looked inward rather than upward for enlightenment and transcendence.”

This transformation occurred independently in four different regions during the Axial Age, a pivotal period lasting from 900 B.C. to 200 B.C., producing Taoism and Confucianism in China, Buddhism and Hinduism in India, Judaism in the Middle East and philosophic rationalism in Greece [which, while not monotheism, would “lay the groundwork for what Ms. Armstrong calls the second great transformation, the scientific revolution of the 16th century”]….



In historical time the great transformation is remote. But Ms. Armstrong argues passionately for its relevance to a world still embroiled in military conflict and sectarian hatreds. This is the powerful undertow to her book. “In times of spiritual and social crisis, men and women have constantly turned back to this period for guidance,” she writes. “They may have interpreted the Axial discoveries differently, but they have never succeeded in going beyond them.”



Even further, Ms. Armstrong argues that the radicalism of the great Axial thinkers has yet to be understood. Their notion of the religious life was concerned less with belief systems than with self-transformation. Most were uninterested in questions of theology. “Their objective was to create an entirely different kind of human being,” she writes.




Temporary Cultures: The End



As I work on and think about the last book in my Cold War series, wherein 1989 ushers in the demise of socialism in Eastern Europe, I find I’m most concerned about the one true communist character in the book, Brano Sev.



Since the first book, set in 1948, Brano has been the one true devotee. He’s a spy who does what he believes needs to be done to keep this “Great Experiment” (as he calls it) afloat. Unlike his associates in the Ministry for State Security, he doesn’t use the system for his own gain, and in this way he’s a true innocent. But he’s no fool either, and once Gorbachev starts instituting changes, he’s able to see where they’re headed. In this book, Brano’s a man in mourning for what could have been.



This kind of situation has always appealed to me: a character within a culture that is ending—that, by ending, proves its falsity. Not just culture, but belief. The realization that the belief that defines you is simply not correct. (Think of it as a midlife crisis to the nth power.)



A few years ago I took notes for one of the unwritten stories that fill my hard drive. It was to be about a master phrenologist, a specialist in measuing bumps on the skull to infer personality traits, who faces the realization that his entire career, and life, has been a sham.



What does that feel like? How does it feel to learn that all your aspirations were unfounded, and to be there to witness its public downfall?



On the larger scale, one obvious example is Nazi Germany. It lasted from 1933 and 1945, a mere 12 years, but the kind of devotion it achieved was intense. Once the war ended, Europe (and Argentina) was littered with men and women who were faced with the death of their dream. The occupying Allies joked that it was amazing Hitler lasted as long as he did, because they hadn’t met a single Nazi since the shooting had stopped. But of course most of those broken people lining up for de-Nazification certificates were, years before, thrilled by the rise of their enigmatic, charming and vitriolic leader. The man had, at one time, filled them with hope.While not the predicted thousand years, twelve years is still a long time. It can be a third of an adult’s life. It’s long enough to establish the basic belief systems of a child into adulthood. It’s long enough to build up a country based on a new ideal. Long enough, that is, to produce true believers who can predict their devotion lasting through to their old and peaceful deaths.



This point was driven home when I visited a church in Hallstatt, Austria. Its cemetery is limited, so after a few years they’d dig up the bones of the dead, clean and transfer them to the church, where, in a special room, they were separated and stacked in a kind of macabre art. Along the front were numerous skulls, most of them tattooed with crosses or other symbols, and one of them caught my attention. On its white forehead was a perfectly painted swastika.



My assumption is that this was in the dead person’s will. That when he was dug up, the symbol would show for eternity that he was a true devotee. I wondered if this person died before or after 1945.



So among the hungry hordes of postwar Germany, among the devotees whose dreams had been crushed, they tried to figure out what had happened. I imagine many felt the aggressive Allies had ruined what could have been a glorious thousand-year Reich. Others, particularly after watching the newsreels of, or being forced to visit, the death camps, were faced with the horror of what their beloved Reich was doing in their name. What their belief system really meant, once it was pushed to the extreme.



I wonder, then, how that feels.



Like in postwar Germany, in post-Cold War Eastern Europe, you seldom find a communist. Or, you seldom find someone who admits to being a devotee of communism. When you do, it’s often a pensioner who, in the unpredictable world of capitalism, longs for the security—the lack of violent crime and the steady, predictable pension checks—of communism. They’re too old to give much of a damn about freedom of speech; they only want to live their quiet lives with a little comfort. But among those still of working age, it’s as if the communists rose into the sky in 1989 like the Good on Judgment Day.



But of course that’s not true, and my character, Brano Sev, will not succumb to this sudden political amnesia. As I’ve written it so far, he still believes in the promise of communist equality, but when he looks back finds scapegoats everywhere. The steady and destructive economic and military stranglehold of the West, and, more importantly, the steady rot of opportunists who, unlike him, use the system to accumulate as much wealth as possible without regard for the glorious possible future.



Forget the gulags for a moment, the bread lines and oppression. Remember that for Marxists, true communism never got around to happening. What we saw in Russia and Eastern Europe was the Dictatorship of the Proletariat, the phase of restructuring before the institution of communism. Of course, the problem with this phase is that those in control never want to say, “OK, it’s time for me to step down.”



Unlike Nazi Germany, the People’s Democracies had forty good years. OK, not good, but forty years to seed, cultivate and grow their own cultural values. They rebuilt cities to these specifications, taught children who became adults in this system, spread their values to new countries, and were taken seriously across the globe as a real, viable way of living. As a viable truth.



This is why I’ve been so interested in the socialist world the last few years. For an artificial system with Moscow-imposed values, it lasted a remarkably long time. For a system so rife in waste and corruption it sustained itself (albeit with subsidies) remarkably well.



In 1989, at the very cusp of the end, I remember arguing in Zagreb with a Croatian economics student the validity of communist economics. He believed capitalist economies were too volatile and would eat themselves up, while the socialist centralized economy was stable and steady. And looking at the general prosperity of Yugoslavs at that time, it was hard to convince him otherwise, though I tried. If I’d known then just how much of Yugoslavia’s economy was propped up by money from the West, I’d have made a better argument.



I sometimes wonder about that student now, whose whole education was based on something that proved to be inherently flawed—or, at the very least, useless for his career. (Marxist economics students and professors all over the Eastern Bloc suddenly found themselves without careers.) Sadly for him, the additional insult was that his country was ripped apart by war, turning a beautiful, multiethnic and paper-wealthy country into a third-world wasteland.



In the West, it’s easy to see these 20th century socialist systems as entirely artificial, kept in check by Soviet money and Soviet troops. It’s easy to see it all as a kind of bleak joke. But it wasn’t a joke, and for many (though certainly not all) it represented the highest truth. Then, one day, their highest truth became the joke of the world, surviving only in certain Western university campuses, and in Cuba, China and North Korea.



What does that feel like? For the believer, it must feel like the world has just ended. No—it must feel like she or he has ended. That’s what I’m trying to come to terms with as I write this last book. It’s not a simple thing to grasp.



Spezi arrest

You’ve probably already seen it over at Sarah’s, but I’ll spread the news a little more over here. The Italian journalist Mario Spezi, writing partner of American novelist Douglas Preston on a book about the infamous “Monster of Florence”, has been picked up by Florentine police on charges of “slander and defamation”.



For some background on the case, see Sarah’s previous post from when the trouble started brewing. It seems largely a case of politicians desperate not to be embarrassed by a meddlesome journalist, whose research has turned up a series of grotesque mishandlings by the Italian police concerning the capture of the Monster. Here’s the AP coverage of the arrest, with a little more background.



Douglas Preston has released a statement, which is worth a read:





The accusations against Spezi, according to press accounts, are slander and defamation, disturbing the public order, and obstructing a criminal investigation. He was, essentially, arrested for doing his job as a journalist. One news report says that he is also being charged with an unsolved murder that occurred thirty-one years ago — an utterly absurd charge.


He adds:

It is no coincidence that this arrest comes just twelve days before the release of our book.


Indeed.



Follow the link, look into it, and if you feel as I do, go ahead and write to the people Preston suggests should be contacted at the Ministro della Giustizia and the Ministro dell’Interno. Says Preston:

Italians care a great deal what Americans think. I have seen early press reports in Italy and much of it is filled with dismay at this treatment of one of Italy’s most respected journalists. This is not “business as usual” in Italy and it can be reversed, if we make a big enough noise.


I’m not much of a joiner, whether we’re talking about clubs, political parties, or petitions. But as time passes and I learn more about the kinds of shit my fellow writers have to deal with in various countries, it makes me reconsider my overall ambivalence. This is one such case.