Reinvent with Ziggy

Earlier this year, I went through the minor trauma of having to toss my iPod. It went through some mysterious illness that ruined the hard drive (suspiciously, the same thing happened to my computer a month or so ago as well). It might not have been such a tragedy, but I’d never backed up those 40 gigs of music, podcasts and audiobooks, and subsequently lost it all.



But I’m never too put out by losing “stuff”. In fact, I view these times as opportunities to clean out the clutter, and over the past half year, I’ve been slowly refilling my iPod with the things I remember enjoying most.http://www.teenagewildlife.com/Albums/ZS/back-small.jpg



Among these is a career’s worth of albums by David Bowie, that master of reinvention, and often brilliant creator of pop songs. The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars has been filling our apartment a lot these last weeks.



http://www.spauda.lt/menas/images/ziggy.jpgZiggy is glam’s Sgt Pepper. You can argue that one album is better than the other, but the similarities are striking. Both chart the life and career of a fictional musical prodigy—one an old-time Englishman, the other a star-time extraterrestrial. Both albums are conceptual, though neither is bound too much by its concept. And of course both albums are filled with fantastic songwriting.



“Five Years” “Moonage Daydream” “Starman” “Hang Onto Yourself” “Rock ‘n’ Roll Suicide”…et cetera.



What I love about Bowie, even when I don’t necessarily love all his songs, is the fearlessness and creativity that imbues all of his work. When he changes character, as he did at the end of the Ziggy era when he moved over to Berlin to go all Germanic, then again in the eighties with his huge white jackets and puffy hair—and even again when he went slick and minimalist with Tin Machine—when Bowie changes, he changes wholeheartedly. When he reinvents, it’s a true reinvention, not just a different hairstyle.



http://www.canaltrans.com/musica/images/bowie/bowie.jpgWriters also change. While sometimes it’s a creative choice, it’s often a market decision. Authors don’t have to fret over the clothes they wear, because people hardly bother with author photos, and we no longer get lengthy Life Magazine spreads. Writers reinvent by switching genres, switching narrative focus, and sometimes even by changing their names.



I bring this up because it’s been on my mind lately. My Cold War series is finished, this next year will see its completion in print, and I’m working on something that I want to be different in many ways. Tone, locale, character types, and plot structure. Other things too, but these are the central changes.



Though I’ve had my fair share of critical attention over these last years, my sales have dropped year by year. It’s been a puzzling and worrying phenomenon, particularly when I believe my writing has gotten better with each book, and the reviews have pretty much confirmed that. My publisher works hard to get my books out there too. So what’s the problem?



It’s hard to say, though I tend to fall back on the supposition that communist-era thrillers with Eastern European main characters (Alan Furst’s romantic intrigues aside), told in the way I tell them, don’t really have much of a market. Or maybe it’s simply that the Lady Luck of Marketing hasn’t chanced upon my career yet. Either way, my career so far has been a critical success and popular failure, and I’d like that to change.



So, like Bowie, I’m trying to reinvent. I haven’t yet seriously considered a pseudonym, instead focusing on the feel of this new book. Characters from my own homeland, locales a little more familiar to readers (in this book’s case, I’m starting in Western Europe), and a plot structure that—one hopes—thrills from the start and pulls you along, while still hopefully maintaining the critical recognition.



Man Ray's Artaud



Listening to Bowie, with his inspired creations and recreations, I keep feeling the urge to push it further. New name? Why not? Fresh author photos in the severe, otherworldly style of Man Ray’s portraits? That sounds fun. And an entire fake biography to this new name…an extraterrestrial bio? Sillier things have been done. And interviews done in character, with wild pronouncements about how the world is going to end in Five Years?



It sounds like a blast, though I doubt I’ll do any of these things. It’s hard enough just writing a good book.



Which is why I respect Bowie so much. He not only produced classic songs, but he took control of every aspect of that career and its public face. As the writers out there know, it’s so hard to feel like you have any control over any of this. We can pump up our web sites or, if we live in our home countries, do some in-store self-marketing—but these things feel like drops in an ocean.



But we might as well try to stretch our imagination, and see what comes of it.



Anybody out there feel this urge? I’ve posted before about impressive efforts, but do any of you have some ludicrous, or even sober, ideas to burst yourself upon the world? (Years ago, I suggested to my agent that I wave a pistol around in Times Square—it would get me a mention in the New York Times. He seemed apprehensive.)



I don’t know what, if anything, I will do, but I might as well go buy a wig. A head of hair isn’t a bad first step.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

Death Thoughts

It’s been an enormously difficult week here in Budapest for my girlfriend and myself. Our dog, Bogi, who I said a couple weeks ago had something that “might be liver cancer” went in for a biospy a week ago Monday. By the next day his symptoms—weakness, primarily—had become pronounced. On Thursday, he was diagnosed with acute anemia and irreversible Hemangiosarcoma, and over the next three days disintegrated before our eyes. While there seemed to be no real pain involved, only discomfort, he weakened and shrank until, by Sunday, we were carrying him pretty much everywhere. The speed of the disease really threw us into a cloud of confusion and despair. But by early Monday morning, when he started a loud, labored breathing while laying between us in bed, all we could hope for was an easy passing. Within the hour, he arched his back, as if stretching, and expired.

Bogi & Olen






Distractions & The Wire

I’ve been on one of my typical hiatuses from blogging lately, but with none of the usual excuses. My last novel is in the can, I’m waiting on page proofs, and though it’s been pretty rough going, I think the next book is officially under way. But other distractions have come up. I’m doing some behind-the-scenes career work at the moment (more on this at a later point) and dealing with some tragedy around the house. Our beloved dog, Bogi, has been diagnosed with what is most likely liver cancer, and so, with the visits to the vets, and keeping a hawklike eye on his behavior, one ends up a little exhausted.



Like much of the world, when exhausted I tend to settle in front of the TV. I’ve never made a secret of this, nor of my growing love for that particular form of narrative. As a writer, the thing that usually excites me most about my art is not character or plot, but narrative structure. And the best television series, I’ve always thought, lie closer to the novel form than the simplified structure of films, or even playwriting.



http://img.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/060815/181438__wire_l.jpgGiven this conviction, it’s a surprise that I only recently started to watch HBO’s The Wire. In conversations about television, this show often comes up, with high very praise. Now that I’ve finally watched it from the first season, and am now fully into the fourth, all I can say is, “Wow.”



I’ve stated before that I thought Battlestar Galactica was perhaps the best show going these days, and I know some people snickered at this. I still contend that it’s up there with the best, but The Wire has really altered the television format, and my own expectations.



For one, it’s typical of television that the critical viewer make more allowances than he might for a film or a novel. Overdramatic acting, gee-whiz family cliches, and over-descriptive dialogue intended to give backstory in a quick, if awkward, way. But in The Wire there’s no need for this generosity on the part of the viewer. The dialogue feels natural throughout, and it’s seldom less that perfect.

http://www.1115.org/archives/wires2dvd.jpg


Paid in Full



The Wire





http://www.nemanja.com/images/the_wire.jpg


Gettin' Your Bond On

Over the last week, as I found myself mostly blog-idealess and generally unable to focus on any work, I’ve been listening to Blackstone Audio (they do my books as well) versions of the Fleming Bond books on my iPod. Earlier in the year, I read the actual paper versions of Diamonds are Forever and From Russia with Love, the first of which was okay, then second of which was excellent.



In anticipation of the new movie, I listened first to Casino Royale, which was really very fine. I mean that completely. It’s extremely simple in scope, but the writing is great, and though the attitudes are certainly dated, it had a great feel to it from beginning to end. I was enraptured.



Poking around, I see from iMDB that a lot of initial reaction to the film is ecstatic, which excites me even more. Has anybody out there seen it? If so, pass on your opinion. I really want to know.



143538__blackman_l.jpg



With this in mind, I came across The Rap Sheet’s links to the ranking of Bond Girls. Entertainment Weekly’s 10 Best, 10 Worst, etc. Looking over them made me laugh, reminded me of some real duds, and also made me realize that I actually had an opinion on this score.



Best: Honor Blackman as Pussy Galore in Goldfinger (narrowly beating Lotte Lenya as Rosa Klebb in From Russia)

Worst: Much tougher choice here, but I’ll have to go for Tanya’s Roberts’ excruciating Stacey Sutton in A View To a Kill



You? Or maybe you feel stronger about Bond Boys?

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

OJS

just happen to be the initials I share with OJ Simpson. This is a fact I’ve been aware of since I was young, and OJ was a football star and popping up in the occasional star-studded seventies disaster film. I liked the coincidence, and sometimes referred to myself as OJ Steinhauer.



OJS215.jpgI got over this by the time I hit high school, and largely forgot about the man. Then the murders happened, and no one would let any of us forget about the ex-sportsman and b-movie actor. Because I felt I had to have an opinion on his guilt or innocence, I spent weeks going either way. Then I decided I just didn’t know. I suspected he was guilty, but stranger things than OJ’s innocence have happened in this world.



But then, I decided I didn’t give a damn. Not really. A man kills his ex-wife and her lover. It happens every day, all over the world. It’s a despicable and primitive act, no matter who does it. And no matter how much people wanted to spin it, the resulting trial was less about race relations in America than it was about class and money and what can be bought in America.



And then lots of other things happened in the world and in my own life, and I again forgot all about him. But now we’re all being reminded again with his If I Did It, a completely unnecessary book charting out how Simpson would have committed the murders, had he committed them. A piece of perverse hypothetical musing about how to kill your wife.



Why? I don’t know what Simpson’s reasoning is (the proceeds from the book are supposed to go to his children, not him), but his publisher, Judith Regan, has her own reasoning. She believes he’s completely and obviously guilty, and that this book is a confession. “I would have had no interest in publishing anything but that.”



The families of the deceased are pissed. It’s an insult to the memories, etc, but one major gripe must be that, since the book’s royalties are supposedly heading to the kids rather than to Simpson, they’ll never see the $33.5 million owed to them from their civil suit.

Mr. Simpson lives in Florida, where homestead laws protect a person’s house against seizure for the payment of court judgments. His pension from the National Football League, which has been estimated at $400,000 a year, also cannot be seized. With no other obvious income, there has been little for the victims’ families to recover.








wrote that she believed it was her responsibility as a publisher to bring Mr. Simpson’s words to the public, and she likened her role to “the mainstream publishers who keep Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” in print to this day.”




OJDingo


On the Web: MEMRI

http://www.memri.org/images/uploaded/sd_135206_1.jpgOver the last 4 days, I’ve been computerless. I still am (I’m writing this on my girlfriend’s Mini), but since the sudden failure of my hard drive was clearly a terrorist-related event (what else but the global Jihad could be responsible?), I thought I’d link to an interesting site, MEMRI: The Middle-East Media Research Institute.



I don’t usually show off links found from CNN, but it’s got some interesting sections, in particular the Islamist Websites Monitor Project, which lets you see jihadist training videos from all over the world. You can also find interesting articles, like the verbosely titled, “How Did Men Succeed in Convincing Women to Transform the Free Personality That Allah Endowed Them With Into Enslaved Characters Wearing an Abaya?” Check it out.



And keep in mind the stunning piece of terrorist related news from today. No, not my hard drive, but the kidnapping of up to 150 people in a 20-minute raid in Iraq. It boggles the mind.

(Originally posted at the Contemporary Nomad)

One Nomad's Thoughts for the Day

I’ll still read and I’ll still care and I’ll still complain like the enlisted man I am and in the end I’ll be just another old man yelling at the TV. Because our democratic republic is dead. The experiment was interesting, and lasted for a good long while as these things go. But we’ve lived through a quiet coup sponsored by people we can’t see. We’ve become a banana republic and we can’t even buy a decent banana.




Liberating Reviews

Another newspaper review came over the transom today, earmarked for Sunday’s (tomorrow’s) edition of the LA Times. Paula Woods, a fine author in her own right, has given me the great honor of a lengthy review, entitled “Left Out in the Cold”. It’s a wonderful piece, and clearly favorable. She says,

With its plots and counterplots, secret identities and tradecraft taken straight from the Soviet playbook of the day, “Liberation Movements” is an entertaining, if sometimes implausible, read that should put Steinhauer squarely in the front of the pack of today’s espionage writers. And with complex, engaging characters like Gavra and Katja carrying on the work of Emil, Libarid, Brano and the older hands, it is an exhilarating and enjoyable ride.








CrimeSpree

Olen Steinhauer has outdone himself with LIBERATION MOVEMNETS, the fourth book in his series that features a place and a history more than a specific lead. Beginning with 2003’s THE BRIDGE OF SIGHS, Steinhauer has played out the agonizing history of Czechoslovakia during and after its violent political upheaval.


[…] The meticulous interwoven plot of LIBERATION MOVEMENTS runs from character to character, and time frame to time frame. Many authors could lose a reader by setting this challenge before them. Not Steinhauer. This novel is tight, intelligent and incredibly well done.


here



PortsmouthHerald

Edgar Award finalist Steinhauer’s beautifully crafted novels of crime and political intrigue center on various members of the People’s Militia in an unnamed Eastern European country during the Cold War.


[…] Steinhauer’s complex character development factors in the effect of state repression and secrecy on personality and choices. His atmospheric writing also makes liberal use of irony and humor, much of it sardonic. This is a masterful series, which deserves a much larger readership.


here





Signs of the Apocalypse

ManilowPrince



While others look at the news and find themselves disturbed by, say, the 119 Iraqi policemen killed in the last month, I, on the other hand, believe the world is ending because of this piece of news:





LOS ANGELES - Prince fans, fire up that Little Red Corvette and head for Las Vegas: the purple one will be performing there every weekend starting Nov. 10.



The diminutive rocker will play Friday- and Saturday-night shows at 3121, a nightclub inside the Rio hotel, according to a Wednesday news release by P R Plus, a Vegas firm representing the club.


As a long-time admirer, I’m glad to see the guy’s keeping a regular gig. But what am I supposed to think when the article reminds me that





Prince joins a growing contingent of songsters who have settled in Vegas hotels as regularly featured acts, including Celine Dion, Elton John, Barry Manilow, and Toni Braxton.


Prince and Celine Dion. Certainly, this is one sure sign of the Apocalypse.